Showing posts with label faces. Show all posts
Showing posts with label faces. Show all posts

Saturday, July 9, 2011

Newsmaker: James Murdoch faces biggest test as heir to empire (Reuters)

LONDON (Reuters) – James Murdoch was not responsible for the phone hacking scandal that has engulfed his father's media empire, but that will matter little if his handling of the case does not improve quickly.

Tipped as heir to the empire, Rupert Murdoch's youngest son is under pressure to show he can muster his father's political touch to contain scandal that is damning the family name and slashing by the day the value of media assets that have been in the business for decades.

So far, analysts say he has been slow to realize the enormity of the situation, or to show genuine humility over an episode in which his newspapers have been seen to harass the families of child murder victims, dead soldiers and bombing victims, all to generate stories.

"This is the most serious political crisis in a generation (for the Murdochs) -- but as a business crisis it is immense and immensely more significant," said Claire Enders, head of the Enders Analysis research group.

By the time James Murdoch took over at News International, News Corp's British newspaper stable, in 2007, the alleged hacking practices were over, but the scandal had hardly begun, and it fell to Murdoch this week to close the 168-year-old paper at the center of the scandal.

At the heart of the problem, Enders says, is a sense that, after years of wielding a peculiar influence over British politics, James Murdoch and the rest of his company do not know how to handle a situation where they are in the wrong.

"This siege mentality is just not right," she said."They have got to accept that other people in the world have got something to tell them. But that is just not a personality trait one has ever seen from them.

"Their attitude is 'We are better, we're different', and I'm afraid the word 'better' is no longer going to apply if these allegations are proven."

HIP-HOP RECORD LABEL

Born in 1972, James Murdoch dropped out of Harvard in 1995to start a hip-hop record label and once billed himself as a professional cartoonist. Few then would have tipped him to overtake his elder siblings to stand in line to inherit News Corp.

Just 12 years later, he took control of the Asian and European operations of News Corp, which wields influence from Hollywood to Hong Kong and owns not only Britain's biggest-selling paper, the Sun, but also the film studio 20th Century Fox, the U.S. cable network Fox, the television network Star TV, publisher Harper Collins and the Wall Street Journal.

Whether he can match Rupert Murdoch's consummate empire-building ability in the long term is yet to be seen, but James has already shown hints of sharing his 80-year-old father's bullish approach to business.

Smart and clean-cut, James is capable of charming interviewers and the public, but inspires fear among many of those who work for him. He keeps a model of the Star Wars villain Darth Vader outside his London office.

"When James was in the building, you could almost hear the Darth Vader music," said a former News International editor.

"He came across on his TV interview this week as a nice, thoughtful guy. And he may be that. But he's a scary man around the office," said the editor, who declined to be named.

When News Corp's Internet business was founded in the early days of the dot-com boom, James became president. But as boom turned to bust, he moved on to Hong Kong-based Star TV before becoming chief executive of BSkyB in 2003.

That move was initially met with accusations of nepotism, but he quickly impressed analysts and investors by broadening the company from a pure pay-TV offering to include broadband and telephony. But like his father, the younger Murdoch has courted controversy. He stirred up a storm in August 2009 when he used a keynote speech at a major TV festival for a blistering attack on Britain's state-owned broadcaster, the BBC, echoing his father Rupert's speech from the same platform 20 years earlier.

James was promoted to run News Corp's international business from New York in March this year, a move seen as confirming his status as heir to the media empire. But he has still not moved from London, where all of his direct reports are based.

TV OVER PRINT MEDIA

The younger Murdoch has always favored the more profitable television and entertainment arms of the business over the traditional print media on which his father founded the empire.

But growing popular and political anger over the voicemail hacking saga has raised the chances of a delay in government approval for News Corp's bid to buy out the 61 percent of BSkyB that it does not already own.

Prime Minister David Cameron's right-of-center government had already given informal blessing to the takeover, despite criticism that it gave Murdoch too much media power.

Before the controversy worsened, formal approval had been expected within weeks. But a decision now seems likely to take months. "James Murdoch has not handled the situation well. He surely did know, certainly by 2008, what was going on," Peter Burden, the author of a book on the News of the World, told Reuters. "The problem is they're all very loyal to each other, the Murdochs and their people," he said, in reference to the company's decision to back Rebekah Brooks, a close confidante and editor of the News of the World at the time many of the offences were alleged to have happened.

"James didn't grasp the enormity of the situation. A few months ago he said 'We've put it in a box now and it's contained', and of course he couldn't have been more wrong."

Beyond pure financial concerns, the Murdochs appear also to have also damaged their once untouchable position in British politics, where leaders of political parties openly courted Rupert Murdoch's support.

Andy Coulson, a former editor of the News of the World who quit in January as spokesman for Prime Minister David Cameron, was arrested on Friday over the scandal.

"They don't understand that you can't assume the kind of power they've had in this country without actually behaving as if you're part of the fabric," said Enders.

"And what that means is -- if your employee becomes an employee of the prime minister, you have some responsibility toward that employee being a credit to the prime minister rather than a discredit. They don't get that connection."

James Murdoch needs to show that he does.

(Editing by Kevin Liffey)

Sunday, July 3, 2011

NBA faces $1 million fine for using Facebook or Twitter during lockout (Yahoo! News)

Contract negotiations enact tough new rules against social media leaks

Salary negotiations, salary caps, revenue sharing and just about every other negotiation has come to a standstill today between the NBA and its players. Since the expiration of the current collective bargaining agreement last night between the owners and players, the league has barred any interaction between them through Facebook or Twitter until a new contract is reached.

Should the owners communicate with the players via social media tools, the offender is not only facing a million dollar fine from the league, but the owner's eligibility to participate in draft picks for the new season could also be yanked. This could be devastating to a team that is trying to rebuild for a run at the national title.

The ban on Facebook is particularly tough, extending to coaches, managers and front office personnel. The Twitter blackout is a little more lax. Players can be followed on Twitter, but messages cannot be sent via the social service, nor the retweeting of their updates.

All of this is part of a bigger lockout strategy that puts an end to scouting, European preseason games and support for this summer's Olympic qualifying tournaments. If the two sides don't come to an agreement before the official start of the season, Twitter leaks may soon be the least of their problems.

(Source)

Post by Dan O'Halloran

More from Tecca:

Monday, June 27, 2011

Overachiever Oracle faces high growth hurdles (Reuters)

SEATTLE (Reuters) – Oracle Corp has a habit of beating Wall Street expectations, but some investors fear billionaire Larry Ellison's software and server juggernaut will find it hard to keep up its own pace when it reports earnings and sets new forecasts on Thursday.

The world's No. 1 database software maker is facing wobbly economies across the world, especially in Europe, and might already have reaped the greatest gains from the purchase of Sun Microsystems 18 months ago.

"It ain't easy to keep putting up those kinds of numbers," said Richard Williams at Cross Research, which has no holdings in Oracle.

"The real question's going to be: Do they maintain the kind of growth rates they have been seeing? Or do we a see a slower growth rate implicit in first quarter guidance?"

Oracle, based in Silicon Valley's Redwood Shores, has almost doubled sales and profit in the past five years, helped by a string of acquisitions. It has beaten Wall Street's average sales and earnings estimates for the last six quarters -- often by a good margin -- and topped annual estimates for the last five years.

Aside from that stellar performance, technology investors pay attention to Oracle's quarterly earnings as its fiscal quarters are out of sync with most others and it is the first to give a glimpse of business conditions in the most recent months, in this case April and May.

For Oracle's fiscal fourth quarter, ended May 31, analysts are expecting a 12 percent jump in sales, to about $10.75 billion, and an 18 percent leap in profit, to 71 cents per share. Several have hinted they expect those estimates to be beaten.

But most are focused on the company's forecast of the current quarter's new software sales -- delivered in a conference call after the earnings report by Chief Financial Officer Safra Catz -- which are key to long-term growth.

"I wouldn't be surprised if they forecast a little bit of disappointment going forward, talking down the analysts' estimates for revenue," said Kim Caughey Forrest, senior analyst at money manager Fort Pitt Capital Group, which holds Oracle shares.

Investors may already have priced in some disappointment. Oracle's shares are down 10 percent since the end of April, compared with a 7 percent fall in the tech-heavy Nasdaq. It still trades at about 13.5 times expected earnings for the next 12 months, compared with an average of about 10.7 for its peers.

WEAKNESS, DEALS AHEAD?

Oracle, which vies with Germany's SAP AG and IBM Corp in selling specialized software to companies, and with Hewlett-Packard Co in server hardware, has been largely immune to persistently weak consumer sentiment since the U.S. recession ended two years ago.

But a recent loss of momentum in the U.S. economic recovery and renewed fiscal woes in Greece put a question mark over continuing demand.

Oracle's fiscal fourth quarter is usually its strongest, as it signs deals before its financial year end, but the current quarter is generally its weakest. Investors will have to judge how much of that weakness is more than cyclical.

"In the last four quarters, Oracle has managed to be independent of the rest of the group," said Williams. "What we are looking for in the quarter is to what degree the first quarter will be seasonally weak."

Software maker Adobe Systems Inc warned that lower-than-expected sales in Europe dragged on earnings this week, sending its stock down 6.5 percent on Wednesday.

In the face of faltering economies, Oracle, which has spent more than $42 billion on acquisitions over the past six-and-a-half years might be ready to go back into the market to help keep up its growth rate.

Eighteen months after Oracle's $5.6 billion deal to buy hardware maker Sun, which strongly boosted sales and provided a new set of clients to sell software to, the year-over-year comparisons are getting harder to match.

"They haven't done a large acquisition in a while, that's why I'm assuming we're going to see a little leveling off in year-over-year gains going forward," said Forrest at Fort Pitt.

Some potential targets mentioned by industry watchers include software companies Symantec Corp, BMC Software Inc and CA Techologies, formerly Computer Associates Inc.

"We're getting closer to the point where they are going to have to do another deal," said Williams at Cross Research.

(Reporting by Bill Rigby; editing by Andre Grenon)